Le guide ultime pour thinking fast and slow goodreads
Le guide ultime pour thinking fast and slow goodreads
Blog Article
The Focusing égarement (402) “Nothing in life is as grave as you think it is when you are thinking about it.” We overvalue what’s in our mind at the imminent, which is subject to priming.
A common theme in these cognitive égarement is a failure of our sensation to deal with statistical fraîche. We are good at thinking in terms of occasion and comparisons, fin rang involving chance throw coutumes off. As an example, imagine a man who is shy, calme, and orderly.
There are however a double of problems. Firstly there are some people who apparently are wedded to the conception that people are entirely rational.
Why did the British military resist the permutation? Because it was deeply inconsistent the heroic story of the RAF they believed in. Suppose there are stories I’d die conscience too. Fin not the myth that Kahneman dethroned. Kahneman got the Nobel Prize cognition Economics connaissance showing that the Rational Man of Economics model of human decision making was based je a fundamental misunderstanding of human decision making.
It is very difficult to judge, review or analyze a book that basically rivalité the very idea of human “Rationalism”. Are humans perfectly rational? This dude, Daniel Kahneman, got a Nobel Prize in Economics conscience saying they are not. An ordinary person might have been treated with glare or a stinging slap if he said that to someone’s frimousse. We simply don’t like being told that we are not very rational and certainly not as sagace as we think we are. Hidden in the depths of our consciousness, are some ‘actors’ that keep tempering with our ‘rationality’. And we almost consciously allow this to happen. All in all, this book is a phare en tenant résistance of Behavioral Psychology. Explaining how our mind comes to fin and makes decisions, Kahneman explains that our sensation and decision making portion of brain eh two personalities.
They either will not read this book, read and reject it or indeed read it, accept it's findings plaisant mentally note them as curious aberrations that hommage't affect their belief - this is discussed in the book.
Yet, logically speaking, there thinking slow and fast book summary is no reason to regret a special Fait more than a customary Nous-mêmes, just as there is no reason to weigh losses so much more heavily than gains.
One of my favourite of Kahneman's examples comes from when he was working with Israeli flight instructors. They were convinced that shouting and swearing at trainee pilots was the best method of improving their geste - experience proved it - when a pilot under performed they swore at him and on the next attempt the trainee would do better. Plainly shouting works. Kahneman, perhaps with a sigh, said this was simply regression to the mean.
Perhaps we're not as "free" in our decisions as we might like to think, if "priming" vraiment such a stunningly reproducible effect. Perhaps we're not so determined, if activities that initially require "System 2" attention, can be turned into suivant-brut, "technical-évaluation intuitions.
That their are other ways in speaking embout the way our minds work - that is not found in this big book.
The author's aim is to prove to coutumes that we are not rational beings to the extent we think we are, that evolution vraiment seen to that. And that being the case, the book outlines what we need to know so as not to mess up decisions like we have been doing--like we all do.
Instead, he says, “I Direct by fondement lérot. I don’t read a book pépite see a movie unless it’s highly recommended by people I trust.
Nisbett’s Coursera parcours and Hal Hershfield’s Fermée encounters with Nous-mêmes’s older self are hardly the only en compagnie de-biasing methods désuet there. The New York–based NeuroLeadership Collège offers organizations and individuals a variety of training débat, webinars, and conferences that garanti, among other things, to use brain savoir to teach membre to counter bias.
نگارنده در این فصل به این موضوع میپردازد که با وجود اینهمه خطا در رفتار انسانها، آیا باید آنها را برای انتخاب و تصمیمگیری آزاد گذاشت یا جامعهی مسئول باید به افراد برای انتخاب صحیح کمک کند؟